With the CSRD having entered into force on 1 January 2024, the first companies are required to collect their data on the most significant sustainability topics. These are identified by conducting the double materiality assessment. The double materiality assessment consists of financial materiality and impact materiality.
Financial materiality is the process by which an organisation’s management identifies the most significant ESG risks and opportunities for business continuity and financial performance. In the impact materiality assessment, the impact that the organisation has on its surroundings, people and the environment is assessed among stakeholders.
In this article, we discuss the execution of the financial materiality assessment and the insights it provides to organisations for steering on ESG matters.
First and foremost, the materiality assessment is mandatory to comply with the CSRD. But the financial materiality assessment also provides significant insights and ensures ESG engagement among management.
The entire management board is required to identify and prioritise ESG opportunities and risks. This way, you get on paper the financial risks that the organisation needs to mitigate and the opportunities that can drive the organisation forward. Moreover, the mandatory interaction that takes place improves engagement and general knowledge in the area of ESG among management board members.
The financial materiality assessment is carried out through a physical dialogue with the management board members of the organisation. The board is then asked to identify the significant opportunities and risks for each pre-established ESG topic and to assess these on the short term (1 year), medium term (5 years) and long term (10 years).
This is primarily measured in a quantitative manner. This means that each board member intuitively provides a numerical assessment of the scale, scope and magnitude of the opportunities and risks across the three time horizons. These quantitative assessments are then substantiated with qualitative explanations by the board members. In this way, dialogue emerges among the management board, where visions on opportunities and risks and the current business profile are exchanged.
Given the ‘recent’ developments and the now legal obligation of sustainability, the topic is not always seen as an opportunity, but sometimes also as a threat to the entire organisation and individuals, because companies may think they do not have the knowledge and resources to become more sustainable.
The financial materiality assessment helps companies realise that contributing to sustainability is not impossible. The identification can contribute to the use or reallocation of existing resources to make a positive contribution to material opportunities or risks, such as the efficient use of raw materials, investing profits in sustainable energy, or reusing waste.
Identifying the material ESG topics also helps the management board hear and acknowledge issues that other stakeholders have observed. Acknowledging the stakeholders, both internal (employees) and external (suppliers, customers, or affected communities), and their perspective on the organisation helps create a shared agenda and engagement.
This also brings other dialogues and discussions to the surface among the management board, where the different opinions and perspectives of its members are discussed. For example, regarding the influence of employees on business operations: the human resource manager looks at employees within the organisation, while the procurement manager also considers workers in the value chain.
Or one staff member thinks of a social contribution in terms of the headquarters region, while another thinks of affected communities in the value chain. This creates a picture of the organisation through the people who are most involved.
The implementation of the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) marks an important turning point in the way companies deal with sustainability, particularly through the emphasis on the double materiality assessment.
For some companies, this will be their first engagement with sustainability. Therefore, this approach ensures the deep integration of sustainability into strategy and business operations, and emphasises the importance of dialogue between management board members and stakeholders.
Recognising the influence of ESG risks and opportunities on both financial performance and societal impact is crucial for future business strategies. The focus is not only on compliance, but also on leveraging sustainability as a strategic opportunity. By adopting a multifaceted approach, weighing both financial and societal aspects, companies can better respond to material issues that are relevant to their unique organisation, strategy and business operations. This process therefore promotes not only a legal obligation but also broader awareness and engagement with sustainability issues within and outside the organisation.
Want to learn more? Contact Kroll SR.
